Allegations linking YSRCP’s liquor policy with diseases false, says party leader
Amaravati: A senior leader from the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP) has dismissed allegations that the Andhra Pradesh government’s liquor policy is causing health issues among citizens. The leader termed the accusations as “baseless, politically motivated, and aimed at misleading the public ahead of elections.”
The remarks come amid rising criticism from opposition parties and social media debates alleging that spurious liquor being sold under the government-regulated policy is linked to an increase in diseases and health complications.
“These allegations are a part of a deliberate misinformation campaign. The YSRCP government has implemented strict quality controls to ensure safe and legal alcohol distribution,” the party spokesperson stated.
The leader emphasized that all liquor sold through state outlets is quality-tested and certified, and no credible medical reports have linked the state’s liquor to any public health crisis.
He further accused the opposition of trying to defame the ruling party through fearmongering tactics instead of focusing on constructive debate or presenting alternatives.
The YSRCP also pointed out that the current liquor policy was designed to reduce overall consumption and curb illegal sales, with regulated pricing and tighter surveillance.
Health department officials have also clarified that recent cases of illness in some districts are unrelated to liquor and are being caused by seasonal infections or other factors.
The party reiterated its commitment to public health and transparency, stating that it welcomes any independent investigation if necessary.
This statement is seen as an attempt by the YSRCP to regain control of the narrative, as the issue is gaining traction in political circles and media discussions.
The controversy erupted after a few viral videos surfaced showing individuals allegedly affected by alcohol-related complications. However, authorities say these claims are unverified and under review.
Political analysts believe such controversies will intensify as the state heads toward elections, with parties using every opportunity to sway public opinion.
As the debate continues, the public awaits clear, evidence-based information on the issue rather than politically charged statements from either side.
